Burden of proof in CIS disputes: what you need to know
The burden of proof in CIS disputes is an essential part of the legal process surrounding disputes that arise from negative listings in the Centraal Informatie Systeem (CIS). In this blog post, we discuss in detail the rules and practical aspects of the burden of proof in CIS disputes, so that you better understand your rights and obligations when you are confronted with a CIS listing. Whether it concerns demonstrating that a listing is inaccurate or challenging the lawfulness of a notification, understanding the burden of proof can be crucial to successfully resolving your dispute.
What is the CIS and what does a CIS dispute involve?
The Centraal Informatie Systeem (CIS) is a reporting hub where insurers collect and exchange data on claims and fraudulent activities. The system is intended to combat insurance fraud and to improve risk assessment. However, because sensitive data are shared and recorded, disputes can arise about the accuracy and lawfulness of these listings. A CIS dispute may arise, for example, if you believe that a listing is incorrect, incomplete, or not legally justified. In such cases, it is important to know who must provide which evidence to resolve the dispute.
The legal context of the CIS is also complex. Listings can have far-reaching consequences, such as refusal of insurance or higher premiums. It is therefore crucial in a CIS dispute to understand which party must demonstrate that the listing is justified, and which means of proof are sufficient to that end. For more background on the system itself, see our page CIS listing: what is it and how do you remove it?.
The legal basis of the burden of proof in CIS disputes
The burden of proof in CIS disputes is not explicitly regulated in a single statute, but follows from general principles of Dutch civil procedure and the specific rules that apply to personal data and insurance listings. The Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (AVG; EU General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR) provides, for example, that personal data must be correct, accurate, and up to date. In addition, the Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens (Wbp) plays a role, although it has since been replaced by the AVG.
In practice, this means that the party that creates a CIS listing—usually the insurer—must be able to demonstrate that the notification is justified and substantiated. This falls under the so-called burden of proof, meaning that this party must provide evidence to support its assertion. The insured who challenges a dispute generally does not have to prove by themselves that the listing is incorrect, but can suffice with putting forward arguments and evidence that cast doubt on the accuracy of the listing.
Anyone who contests a CIS listing should set out the concrete facts and documents in the file. First request access to the listing and note which data you believe are factually incorrect. Stichting CIS refers questions about the reason for or details of a listing to the insurer that placed the listing.
The role of evidence in CIS disputes
Evidence plays a central role in substantiating your position in a CIS dispute. This may include documents such as claim forms, correspondence with the insurer, or witness statements. Digital data, such as CCTV footage or GPS tracking, may also be relevant. In the context of CIS disputes, it is important that the evidence is reliable, relevant, and persuasive.
An example from practice: suppose you dispute that you were involved in a loss event, while the insurer has made a listing. You could, for example, submit CCTV footage showing that you were elsewhere at the time of the loss, or witness statements supporting your account. The insurer will then have to show, in the face of this evidence, that the listing is nonetheless justified—for example, with a loss adjuster’s report or a police report.
Note that merely disputing a listing without supporting evidence is usually insufficient; you must present concrete evidence to have the listing removed. This aligns with general civil procedure, in which the law of evidence requires that factual assertions be substantiated. The balance of the burden of proof, however, lies with the party making an assertion—often the insurer.
Burden of proof when contesting an unjustified CIS listing
If you believe that a CIS listing is unjustified, it is your task to make this plausible. This does not mean that you must fully prove that the listing is wrong, but you must present sufficient facts and circumstances to cast doubt on the accuracy of the listing. The insurer must then prove that the listing is justified.
A practical example is a situation where you have filed a claim, but the insurer alleges fraud and records this in the CIS. You could then, for example, show that the claim form was correctly completed and that there was no intent or falsehoods. This may be done by providing invoices for repairs, witness statements, or other documents that support your account. The insurer must then demonstrate that there actually was fraud, for example with an expert report.
In some cases, it may be necessary to initiate court proceedings to have the listing annulled. The court will then assess whether the insurer has sufficiently discharged its burden of proof and whether your counterevidence is sufficient to declare the listing unjustified. For more information about the difference from other listings, see our article EVR listing: difference from CIS explained.
The impact of the burden of proof on the outcome of CIS disputes
The burden of proof is often decisive in the outcome of CIS disputes. Because the CIS is a system that shares negative information with potentially major consequences—such as refusal of new insurance or higher premiums—it is essential that only justified listings are recorded. If the insurer fails to provide sufficient evidence, the listing can be annulled.
A well-known example is a decision by Kifid (Klachteninstituut Financiële Dienstverlening), in which an insured successfully challenged an unjustified CIS listing because the insurer could not provide conclusive evidence of fraud. Kifid found that the burden of proof lay with the insurer and that the lack of concrete evidence led to removal of the listing (Kifid.nl).
The importance of a proper evidentiary basis is also visible in the fact that insurers increasingly use experts and data analysis to substantiate their positions. For you as the insured, it is therefore essential to obtain timely and sound legal advice to strengthen your position.
Practical tips for collecting evidence for CIS disputes
If you have a CIS dispute, it is wise to start collecting relevant evidence immediately. This can make the difference in successfully contesting a listing. Some practical tips:
- Keep all correspondence with the insurer, including emails, letters, and notes of telephone calls.
- Collect original documents such as claim forms, invoices, repair reports, and witness statements.
- Where possible, request evidence from the insurer, for example the expert report or CCTV footage.
- Document the situation as fully as possible, for example by taking photos of the damage and circumstances.
- Be mindful of time limits: a CIS listing can only be contested within certain periods.
It is also advisable to contact a specialist lawyer at an early stage, such as Arslan Advocaten, who has experience with CIS disputes and can guide you in collecting and assessing evidence. More about the incidents register can be found on our page Incidents Register: how do you get listed and what can you do?.
The role of the courts and dispute-resolution bodies in the burden of proof in CIS cases
If a CIS dispute cannot be resolved out of court, it can be submitted to the court or to Kifid. In assessing the case, the court or Kifid will make a careful weighing of the burden of proof. The party that alleges something must prove it. In CIS cases, this means that the insurer must demonstrate that the listing is justified and that there is a valid ground for listing.
The court will consider the quality of the evidence and the arguments of both parties. If the insured makes it plausible that the listing is incorrect, the court may reverse the burden of proof and require the insurer to provide the evidence. In case of ambiguities or insufficient evidence, the listing may be annulled.
Kifid has also emphasized in multiple decisions the importance of a correct burden of proof and serves as a low-threshold body for resolving CIS disputes. For extensive case law on this topic, see rechtspraak.nl.
Burden of proof in CIS and the importance of legal assistance
Dealing with the burden of proof in CIS disputes requires legal expertise. The rules can be complex and the importance of a correct listing is significant. Legal assistance can help you collect, assess, and present the evidence correctly. Moreover, a lawyer can negotiate with the insurer on your behalf or initiate proceedings before the court or Kifid.
At Arslan Advocaten we have extensive experience with CIS disputes and can advise you on the best strategy for your situation. We help you not only with collecting evidence, but also with formulating your legal arguments and conducting the procedure. This significantly increases your chances of a successful outcome.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly does burden of proof mean in a CIS dispute?
Burden of proof means that the party making an allegation must provide the evidence that supports that allegation. In CIS disputes, this usually means that the insurer must demonstrate that a listing is justified, for example because there was insurance fraud or incorrect data. The insured must indicate why they believe the listing is incorrect, but does not have to fully prove that the listing is wrong.
Can I have a CIS listing removed if I have evidence that it is incorrect?
Yes. If you can provide evidence that a CIS listing is incorrect or unlawful, you can request removal of the listing. This can be done via the insurer itself, but legal steps are often necessary, for example by filing a complaint with Kifid or initiating court proceedings. The stronger your evidence, the greater the chance of removal.
What are the consequences if the insurer has insufficient evidence for a CIS listing?
If the insurer cannot provide sufficient evidence for a CIS listing, this can lead to the listing being annulled or removed. This prevents you from being unfairly disadvantaged in future insurance applications or premium calculations. In addition, the insurer may be held liable for any damage resulting from an unjustified listing.
Read also
- CIS listing at insurers – what does this mean for you?
- CIS listing at banks – consequences and your rights
- Removing an EVR listing: what are your rights?
Need help?
Do you have a CIS dispute and are you unsure about the burden of proof or your legal position? At Arslan Advocaten we are ready to assist you with expert advice and professional support. Contact us for a free initial consultation and discover how we can help resolve your CIS dispute.
Need help from a lawyer?
Contact our Rotterdam office for a free intake appointment.
Need help? Our BKR lawyer will be happy to help you. Feel free to get in touch for a free initial advice.
