The Rent Tribunal has ruled in your favour, but the landlord does not pay

23 September 2026
Picture of Arslan Advocaten

Arslan Advocaten

Foto van Arslan Advocaten

Arslan Advocaten

Need help urgently?

Choose a location

The Rent Tribunal has ruled in your favour, but the landlord does not pay

A favourable decision from the Rent Tribunal (Huurcommissie) does not mean that a bailiff can collect the money straight away. First check what kind of decision it is and whether a period for lodging an objection (verzet) or proceedings before the subdistrict court judge (kantonrechter) is still running. If payment is not forthcoming, a court judgment may be needed to enforce your monetary claim.

Nederlands: Lees dit artikel in het Nederlands: Huurcommissie geeft u gelijk, maar de verhuurder betaalt niet

Türkçe: Bu makaleyi Türkçe okuyun: Kira Komisyonu size hak verdi, ancak kiraya veren ödeme yapmıyor

The Rent Tribunal may, for example, determine that the rent should be lower or that less is owed in service charges (servicekosten). It must then be calculated what this means for the payments between you and the landlord.

Read exactly what the decision says

Look at the period, the amount determined and the effective date. A decision on an advance payment is not the same as a final statement of account. A temporary rent reduction because of defects also works differently from a decision on the initial rent.

Draw up a month-by-month overview of what you paid and what was owed according to the decision. Take earlier refunds into account and avoid claiming the same amount twice. Raise any uncertainties before you demand a large total sum.

Objection and the eight-week period

As a rule, an objection (verzet) against a chair’s decision can be lodged with the Rent Tribunal within three weeks of the date on which the decision was sent. In addition, after a chair’s decision or a committee decision, the matter can be brought before the subdistrict court judge within eight weeks of that date. Always check the information on legal remedies in your own decision.

The court route is not an ordinary appeal in which the only question is whether the Rent Tribunal made a mistake. The subdistrict court judge can reassess the dispute concerned in full. See the official explanation from the Rent Tribunal on what happens after the decision.

Request payment with a verifiable calculation

Send the landlord the decision, your overview and a clear deadline for payment. State your account number and ask for a reasoned response if the calculation is disputed. Keep the letter businesslike and distinguish between the principal sum, any interest and costs.

Also check whether the decision really is a binding ruling. An opinion on a maintenance dispute in the private sector has a different status. Not every document bearing the Rent Tribunal’s letterhead has the same legal effect.

When is the subdistrict court judge needed

A Rent Tribunal decision is not an enforceable title that allows a bailiff simply to levy an attachment. If the landlord does not pay voluntarily, proceedings for payment may be necessary. In those proceedings, the basis and the extent of your claim must be set out clearly.

The Dutch judiciary describes how rent disputes are handled. If proceedings are already under way, it is important to consider how your monetary claim fits into them and which documents must be submitted.

Setting off against future rent

Setting the amount off yourself may seem simple, but it can lead to a new dispute if the counterclaim or the conditions have not been established. According to the landlord, an incorrect set-off may result in rent arrears. So first assess whether a set-off is permitted and how you should declare it.

Keep the contract, the decision, the date on which it was sent, the payment overview and the correspondence, even after the proceedings have ended. It is precisely the combination of these documents that shows why you are reclaiming a particular amount.

First establish the legal status of the document

Read at the top and bottom of the decision whether it is a chair’s decision, a committee decision or an opinion. These documents may involve different follow-up steps. In a maintenance dispute in the private sector, an agreed advisory procedure may apply; do not treat that opinion, without looking into it, as if it had the same effect as a binding decision under the law.

Keep the complete document and the covering letter. The date of sending and the information on legal remedies are what matter, not just the date on which you opened the file. If anything is unclear, ask for an explanation in good time. Classifying the document wrongly may lead you to rely too early on it being final and binding or, conversely, to miss a relevant deadline for your own objection.

A court route also exists after a chair’s decision

The Rent Tribunal states that an objection against a chair’s decision can be lodged within three weeks of the date on which it was sent. According to the official explanation, the matter can also be brought before the subdistrict court judge within eight weeks of that date. It is therefore not correct simply to assume that an objection must always be pursued first. Read the current explanation of the steps after the decision.

Have it determined which route suits your situation and how a legal remedy that has already been lodged affects the next steps. A request to correct an obvious clerical or arithmetical error is, moreover, a different matter from an objection on the merits. Do not assume that a request for correction automatically suspends all other deadlines. Keep the documents you receive and the procedural dates in a single overview.

Turn the decision into a month-by-month overview

For each month, record the rent or charges under the valid decision, the amount actually paid and any refunds. List separately which items fall outside the decision. This makes clear whether there is a claim for repayment and how large it is. A total taken from your bank statements may also include advance payments or other payments that are not all affected.

A worked example: if € 100 per month too much was paid over six months and € 150 has already been refunded, € 450 remains. This example assumes that the decision and the payments do indeed produce those amounts. Also check whether existing rent arrears are reduced by the lower rent that has been set. You cannot claim the same correction in full as a refund and also deduct it again from a debt.

A payment request with clear enclosures

A letter might read: “The enclosed decision of [date and case number] shows that an amount of [amount] was owed for [period]. According to my enclosed payment overview, I paid [amount]. After deducting [earlier refund], a balance of [balance] remains. I request that you pay this amount into [account] within [appropriate period] or explain in writing your specific objections to the calculation.”

Keep the principal sum, interest and any costs separate. Do not state an arbitrary percentage for interest and do not assume that costs are owed automatically because you write a letter. The conditions and starting date must each be correct in their own right. Keep proof of receipt and the response. An objection on the merits relating to one month can then be examined in a targeted way, without having to reconstruct the entire balance again.

Binding is not the same as enforceable

A decision may determine the legal relationship between tenant and landlord without itself being the title on which an attachment can be levied. Enforced collection usually requires an enforceable title issued by a court. A bailiff can advise you or send a formal demand, but cannot enforce your entire claim solely on the strength of the Rent Tribunal’s letterhead.

In payment proceedings, make sure it is clearly set out how the decision and the payments together support the claim. Enclose the relevant documents and check the identity of the landlord you are suing. The address where you rented is not always the correct current address for service of documents. The Dutch judiciary explains how rent disputes are handled.

If the landlord takes the dispute to court again

Proceedings before the subdistrict court judge may require a substantive response on the original rent issue. The earlier decision is an important document, but it does not replace your response to the writ of summons. Read which parts are being contested and which other applications are being made. Keep track of the court dates and gather the original evidence again in an orderly way.

Also discuss whether your claim for repayment should be included in the same proceedings. Depending on your procedural position and the applicable rules, this may require specific wording. Do not start several cases about the same amounts without coordinating them. An integrated approach can prevent the monetary claim from lagging behind while the substantive rent dispute is already being dealt with.

Declare a set-off against future rent carefully

If you still live in the property, a set-off may seem attractive. First check whether the counterclaim is sufficiently established and whether the other conditions have been met. Decide which amount is set off against which rent instalment and explain this clearly. An unspecified deduction may appear in the landlord’s records as new rent arrears.

Keep a running balance in which each set-off appears only once. Pay on time any amounts that are not validly set off. If in doubt, have the consequences assessed in advance, especially if the landlord is already threatening termination. For that risk, see rent arrears and eviction from a home.

After a judgment, also consider whether the claim can be recovered

A court order to pay gives more options for enforcement, but does not guarantee that the other party has sufficient assets. Discuss with a bailiff which next steps are possible and proportionate. Enforcement costs and the practical prospects of recovery may influence the choice between an arrangement and immediate measures.

Record a payment arrangement after a judgment carefully and specify what happens if instalments are missed. Keep track of the amounts received and check which interest and costs are still outstanding. The legal determination of the claim and the actual receipt of money are separate steps. A well-organised file helps prevent a largely paid claim from escalating again because of administrative confusion.

Frequently asked questions after a Rent Tribunal decision

Can I have a bailiff collect the money straight away

Not on the basis of the Rent Tribunal’s decision alone. Enforced collection usually requires an enforceable title, such as a court judgment.

Does the eight-week period run from the hearing

What matters is the date on which the decision was sent. Check the date and the information on legal remedies in your decision.

Am I automatically entitled to interest

That depends on the legal basis and the moment from which interest becomes payable. Do not include an arbitrary percentage without a calculation.

What if the landlord goes to court

Respond to the court documents in good time. The earlier decision is relevant, but it does not relieve you of the need to put forward a defence in the new proceedings.

Do I always have to lodge an objection against a chair’s decision first

According to the Rent Tribunal’s current information, in addition to an objection within three weeks, it is also possible to bring the matter before the subdistrict court judge within eight weeks of the date on which the decision was sent. Have the appropriate route determined and read the information on legal remedies in your own decision carefully.

Can the Rent Tribunal collect the repayment for me

No. You must claim any balance due to you from the landlord yourself. If voluntary payment is not forthcoming, court proceedings for payment may be necessary. Make sure you have the complete decision, the relevant deadline dates and a verifiable overview of payments.

What if the landlord disputes only part of my calculation

Ask which component and which months are being disputed and request payment of the undisputed part. Check the objection against your documents. Record a partial payment without unintentionally confirming that the remaining dispute has thereby been fully settled.

Is it wise to wait until I move out

Not necessarily. Deadlines, evidence and the prospects of recovery may in fact be a reason to act sooner. If the claim is sufficiently clear, you can request payment while the tenancy is still running. Do make sure that any set-off and pending proceedings are aligned with each other.

Help with getting your money back

Send the complete decision and your payment overview to Arslan Advocaten. For the general procedure, also read everything about the Rent Tribunal.


Related Legal Services

Share this message

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Categories

Tenancy law

Recent Posts

Need help urgently?

Choose a location